Perioperative care for surgical patients

The topic content is divided into the information types below

Poster ID
1549
Authors' names
Duncan Soppitt, Karina James, Elizabeth Davies, David Burberry
Author's provenances
1. Morriston Hospital; 2. Morriston Hospital; 3. Morriston Hospital; University Swansea; 4. Morriston Hospital

Abstract

Introduction
The NHS backlog in Elective Surgery are a subject of societal concern and political pressure. Over 6,400 patients >65 yrs are currently awaiting surgery at Swansea Bay. What role, if any, can geriatricians play in improving patient and organisational outcomes? Intervention We wrote to all 258 patients on the Cholecystectomy waiting list > 65 yrs with a letter explaining the project and a patient experience questionnaire. An attempt to contact all patients by telephone was made with an intention to ask questions about their health, activities of daily living and frailty and complete a CRANE questionnaire. Patients who were identified as frail either by the CFS or HFRS, with complex co-morbidities and any concerns raised by the CRANE questionnaire were offered a clinic appointment. Clinic outcomes were prospectively recorded. Patients who attended clinic were asked about their experience through another questionnaire and focus groups. Results from phase A (January 2023) The waiting list had 258 patients, 193 (75%) patients spoken to on telephone. 32 of these have been seen clinic to date with another 11 due to attend. These clinics have identified spinal wedge fractures, abdominal aortic aneurysm requiring surveillance, potential malignancy (referred for imaging), possible new diagnosis of RA, optimisation of cardiac drugs (5 patients), polypharmacy management, hyponatraemia; amongst others with several patients referred to other frailty or specialist services. This process was able to reduce the waiting list by 36 patients or 14% of those >65yrs on the waiting list. The focus groups and questionnaires showed patients valued the service.

Conclusion
This project demonstrates that proactive management can yield a substantial benefit, both in optimising patients experience and health outcomes and by producing an organisational benefit by reducing the overall waiting list size and allowing anaesthetic led perioperative clinics to function more efficiently.

Presentation

Poster ID
1172
Authors' names
Dr Peter Robinson
Author's provenances
University Hospitals Dorset

Abstract

Title: Care of Older People undergoing emergency surgery: meeting the standards of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA)

Introduction:

There are well documented in-equalities for outcomes for surgical intervention1,2,3 associated with Age and Frailty including emergency laparotomy4. NELA data has shown over half of such patients are over 65 years old about one fifth are over 80. These patients having significantly higher mortality, longer hospital stays and it has also shown frailty to be an independent marker of poor outcomes.  Through application of key standards these outcomes have improved however input from “consultant geriatrician-led MDT” remains stubbornly low nationally.

Aims:

To improve local Trust performance in meeting the NELA standard: “Peri-operative assessment by a member of the Geriatrician-Led MDT for frail (CFS 5+) patients 65 or older” to >80% (Green: ≥80%, Amber: 50 – 79% Red: <50%) of estimated 100 patients per year.

Methods

  1. Proactive case finding with general surgical teams
  2. Engagement with Emergency Surgical Committee and NELA leads
  3. Improved our own electronic referral system
  4. Assist in development of electronic booking system with emergency laparotomy cases

Results:

We showed a significant improved in meeting the NELA standard from the red zone (Mean: 33% range 5% to 35%) into the amber with a of mean 60%  (quartile range 52% to 78%) but still remains below our target with significant quarterly variation seen.

All referrals and assessment remain post-intervention.

Limitations in measures:

  • Large variations in Frailty assessment and referral process (prospective Vs retrospective)
  • Process rather than a Quality measure
  • No balancing measures - Is there Reduced service elsewhere?

Conclusions:

Following a number of change ideas and despite challenging COVID related staffing issues we showed that a combination of key stakeholder engagement, proactive case-finding and improved electronic referral processes we have improved Geriatrician input in frail patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.  We suspect due to the non-systematic assessment of frailty that we may be missing some patients and or seeing late in care pathway.

References:

  1. NCEPOD 2010
  2. National Service Framework for Older People 2000/2001
  3. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. “Care and compassion” Report of the Health Service Ombudsman on ten investigations into NHS care of older people. 2011.
  4. NELA