Oral nutritional supplement prescribing in care homes: The benefit of dietetic review.

Poster ID
2023
Authors' names
K Taylor 1; S Hope 2; V Goodwin 3
Author's provenances
1. Nutrition and Dietetics; Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust; 2. Geriatric Medicine; Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust; 3. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter.

Abstract

Introduction

Prevalence of malnutrition in care homes is high and oral nutritional supplements (ONS) often prescribed. Prescription and monitoring of ONS use varies considerably within residential settings. Locally dietetics are not funded to visit care homes and input is limited. This project explored dietetic ONS prescribing within care homes in one primary care network within Devon, recording the potential impact on costs.

Methods

All patients prescribed ONS (n=50) across 16 care homes were reviewed, alongside referrals to dietetics (n=39) from November 2022-March 2023. Supplements were switched to first-line formulary supplements where possible, stopped where unnecessary according to dietetic assessment, and a “food first” approach encouraged within homes. Cost of supplements prescribed pre-dietetic assessment, cost of new prescriptions, dietetic staff time and mileage costs were recorded. Supplement cost was calculated from the local formulary and staff cost from NHS oncosts.

Results

Patients seen represented 20% of all residents (89/436) within the 16 care homes, suggesting high suspected clinical need. Mean age was 90 years, ranging from 73-103 years. Female patients accounted for the majority (n=68). Addressing inappropriate prescribing saved £57.62 per day in prescriptions through stopping or changing ONS. Cost of dietetic staff time and milage totalled £3105.80 over the five-month period meaning that after 54 days the dietetic review service was saving money. Patients often preferred first line powder-based supplements, and these were either similar or more appropriate in nutrient content than initially prescribed ONS. For example, one patient affected by pressure ulcers was prescribed a fat emulsion supplement. It contained no protein or micronutrients to promote skin healing (cost £3.15) whilst first-line supplements provided macronutrient and micronutrient needs (cost 52p each and £1.04 total prescription).

Discussion

Dedicated dietetic input for care home residents appears to save costs on ONS prescribing whilst providing specialist nutritional expertise.

Presentation

Comments

This is an important neglected area and you appear to show how to make meaningful improvement and savings.  Thanks

Submitted by BGS Live Test on

Permalink