Acute Care

The topic content is divided into the information types below

Poster ID
1436
Authors' names
SL Davidson 1,2; G Rayers 1; SM Motraghi-Nobes 1; E Bickerstaff 1; L Emmence 1; J Kilasara 4; G Lyimo 3; S Urasa 3; E Mitchell 5; CL Dotchin 1,2; RW Walker 1,2.
Author's provenances
1. Newcastle University, UK; 2. Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK; 3. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania; 4. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Tanzania; 5. North Bristol NHS Trust, UK.
Conditions

Abstract

Background:

As global populations age, healthcare systems are facing challenges posed by multimorbidity, disability and geriatric syndromes. In high-income countries, frailty is a strong predictor of poor hospital outcomes. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment is effective but resource-intensive and unavailable in sub-Saharan Africa where specialist geriatric training and allied health infrastructure are limited.

 

Objective:

To establish clinical outcomes of older adults with frailty admitted to hospital in northern Tanzania.=

 

Methods:

All adults aged ≥60 years admitted to medical wards at four hospitals were invited to participate. Participants were screened for frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). The primary outcome was inpatient death, with secondary outcomes including length of stay, 30-day readmission and delirium (confirmed using the Confusion Assessment Method [CAM]). Outcomes for frail (≥5 on CFS) and non-frail participants (1-4 on CFS) were compared.

 

Results:

Over 6 months, 308/540 patients admitted participated. Reasons for non-participation included death (n=34) and discharge (n=159) before researcher attendance. Mean age of participants was 74.9 years and 154 (50.1%) were female. Of these, 205 (67%) participants had a CFS ≥5. 21 (14.9%) frail participants died, compared with 5 (6.4%) in the non-frail group (Chi-squared, p=.095). Length of stay and re-admission rates were higher in frail participants, but differences were not statistically significant. Delirium was diagnosed in 35 (17%) frail participants, compared with 4 (4%) in the non-frail group (Fisher’s Exact test, p=<.001).

 

Conclusion:

Frailty in older adults admitted to hospitals in northern Tanzania is common and associated with significantly higher rates of delirium. Mortality, readmissions, and length of stay were higher in the frail group, but differences did not reach statistical significance. Type II Error (exacerbated by selection bias from non-inclusion of individuals who were discharged, or died, early in their admission) may explain this. Participants will now be followed-up for 12-months to assess outcomes longitudinally.

Poster ID
1175
Authors' names
BE Warner (1, 2) ; A Harry (2,3); M Wells (2,4); SJ Brett (1, 2); DB Antcliffe (1,2)
Author's provenances
(1) Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; (2) Imperial College London, London, UK; (3) Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; (4) Directorate of Nursing, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Introduction The decision to admit an older patient to the intensive care unit (ICU) should reflect shared goals of care. Resource limitations during the Covid-19 pandemic highlighted challenges in selecting candidates for escalation. Patients and next of kin (NoK) who have experienced ICU are well-placed to reflect on whether the admission was right for them. Objective: To explore older patients’ (65 years) and their loved ones’ views on escalation decision making. Methods Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with patients, NoK of survivors and NoK of deceased who experienced UK ICU admission with Covid-19 respiratory failure between March 2020 and February 2021. A preliminary questionnaire was used to maximise sample diversity of age, sex, ethnicity, survival, decision regret and impact of event scores. Interview data were collected via video conferencing or telephone. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. Results 30 participants were interviewed. Five themes were identified: ‘Inevitability’ - a sense that the illness and its management are out of the control of the patient or their loved one; ‘Disconnect’ - differences between hospital and lay person narratives; challenges to bridging that gap included effective communication aided by technology; ‘Acceptance’ - of the consequences, good or bad, of an intensive care admission as unalterable; ‘Beyond comprehension’ - participants had not contemplated ill health or ICU prior to admission and even with the benefit of hindsight struggled to describe which potential outcomes would be acceptable or unacceptable if they needed to be involved in similar decision-making around escalation in the future; ‘Covid-19’ - unique impact of a pandemic. Conclusion This study, which includes bereaved NoK as well as patients and NoK of survivors, adds perspective to inform decision making regarding treatment escalation of older people.

Presentation

Comments

Really interesting work - thank you!

Submitted by Dr Sarah McCracken on

Permalink

Thank you!

Submitted by Dr Bronwen Warner on

In reply to by Dr Sarah McCracken

Permalink