CGA in acute settings

Background:

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional interdisciplinary tool, designed to promote holistic care of elderly patients and provide a framework for intervention. There is evidence that the CGA reduces mortality and slows progression of frailty. Performing such interventions in the acute setting can be complex and time-consuming.

Introduction:

The Older Person’s Assessment Unit (OPAU) at Weston General Hospital allows early identification of frailty and prompt intervention. We aimed to promote elements of the CGA by providing a tool for utilisation throughout the patient’s admission to coordinate patient care.

Methods:

This was a prospective pre-post intervention study on OPAU. We reviewed medical records in a 5-day period analysing documentation of elements of the CGA. The primary intervention was introduction of a ward-round proforma prompting delirium screening. Following analysis and re-evaluation, a an updated proforma with an additional bone-health prompt was circulated. The completion of proformas was re-assessed.

Results:

Baseline data of 20 patients showed that common presenting complaints were falls and confusion. Only 14% of those who presented with a fall had a documented bone-health screen. 0% of patients with confusion had a delirium screen. After cycle 1, 0% had bone-health screening and 20% had delirium screening. Following cycle 2, 89% of patients who had a fall had completed bone-health screening.

Conclusion:

Implementation of a CGA-orientated ward-round proforma encourages consistent documentation. It demonstrated successful increased uptake of delirium and bone-health screening. The future aim is to introduce a full CGA proforma that encourages opportunistic assessment by all members of the multi-disciplinary team.

Background 

Frailty Same Day Emergency Care (FSDEC) is a service designed to identify and manage frail older people at the hospital front door with a view to provide early Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, implement management and where appropriate support a same day discharge home. 

Introduction 

In September 2023 the FSDEC service opened with 6 assessment spaces adjacent to A&E. This project aimed to quantify the rate of re-admission for patients seen in FSDEC and explore approaches to improve performance.  

Methods 

This QIP utilised a PDSA approach. Baseline re-admission data was collected from a 2 week period in October 2023. Notes were reviewed for all patients seen in FSDEC during this timeframe and reviewed for evidence of any 30 day emergency re-attendances. Cases were then reviewed to identify any links between the 2 attendances and any preventative measures that could have been taken. Following PDSA cycle 1 frailty nurse telephone follow up was implemented. PDSA cycle 2 was a stress test of this (limited) service during winter pressures. PDSA cycle 3 followed expansion of Community Integrated Response Hub (CIRH) and discharged patients being able to self-refer for support once discharged. 

Results 

FSDEC 7 day re-attendance reduced from 10% to 5% after introduction of frailty nurse follow up. This was not sustained over challenging winter months with variable staff availability but did recover in Summer 24. There has also been a gradual improvement in 30 day re-admission by PDSA cycle 3 following roll out of self-referral to CIRH. 

Conclusion 

Emergency re-admissions have reduced following implementation of frailty nurse telephone follow up and expansion of community services including patient access to CIRH for help following discharge from FSDEC. Addressing staffing model could allow for a more consistent follow up service. There is scope to trial this approach on geriatric ward discharges.  

Background

Evidence shows that CGA based in Frailty units is better for patient care (Fox 2012, Ellis 2011). University Hospital Wishaw (UHW) is the only acute site in NHS Lanarkshire that does not have a frailty assessment unit as part of the admission/receiving pathway. Patients are currently admitted to the Medical Assessment Unit (MAU) and seen by either Geriatrician or Medical consultant depending on the time of admission. UHW is working towards a frailty unit but has been limited by space and resource. Instead we have been on a journey of step-wise improvements to establish one.

Methods

Over the course of 5 days, we developed a Rapid Access Frailty Team (RAFT) in a cohort of 10 beds within the existing MAU. Patients were over 65 and had a CFS ≥5. Patients were reviewed by a Geriatrician in morning and afternoon, and had MDT input from Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and a Nurse specialist.

Results

Over the 5 days 28 patients were admitted to RAFT beds. 9/28 (32%) were discharged from RAFT. Length of stay was 32 hours. Patients either went home or moved to a downstream ward if needed. Medical and AHP staff feedback was positive, but nursing staff in MAU voiced it was onerous having all frail adults in one area.

Conclusions

Development of frailty area within a medical assessment unit is possible and appears to lead to improved outcomes and discharge rates compared to non-cohorted areas. We are now looking for an area where we can apply our RAFT principles and have more staff support.

Introduction: It is well established that older adults with hip fracture benefit from comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), but there is less evidence for its use in major trauma. Since 2012 Major Trauma Centres(MTCs) have opened across the UK, with varying access to CGA. We report the requirement and impact of CGA in a MTC in its first year of opening.

Methods: We reviewed all adult patients admitted under the South-East Scotland MTC included in the Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) database from 1st November 2021 – 31st October 2022. We compared: patients under 65y, patients ≥65y who did not undergo CGA, and patients ≥65y who underwent CGA. Outcomes were: review by ED consultant within one hour of presentation, trauma team activation, injury severity score (ISS), CGA within 7 days if CFS≥5, and mortality at 30 days.

Results: 1322 patients were identified: <65y (n=632, median age 48y), ≥65y without CGA (n=397, 77y), and ≥65y with CGA (n=289, 85y). The commonest mechanism of injury in all three groups was fall from standing height (29%, 60%, and 73% respectively). ED consultant review within 1 hour occurred in 37%, 26% and 17% of cases, with trauma team activation occurring in 34%, 20% and 9%. Median ISS were: 10, 10 and 9, and commonest sites of injury in those over 65 were external (e.g. skin), chest and limb. CGA was undertaken within 7 days in 95.1% of those with a documented CFS≥5. Mortality at 30 days was 2.9%, 12% and 8%.

Conclusions: A fifth of patients admitted to our MTC in the first year were older adults with CFS≥5. These patients were undertriaged at several stages despite comparable average ISS across groups. CGA may reduce 30 day mortality. We recommend further research into the benefit of CGA within MTCs.

Introduction

Oncogeriatrics is relatively new concept aligning geriatric services with oncology, whereby older cancer patients have a comprehensive geriatrics assessment (CGA) to support oncology decision-making and improve outcomes and quality of care. Despite the rationale, evidence for effective oncogeriatric services are largely based upon specialist centres. We initiated a feasibility study February 2021, to establish criteria and pathway implications for an Acute Trust without oncology beds.

Method

Following an iterative process, a pathway was established between the Lung MDT and the established frailty unit. Patients with lung cancer who met criteria would be seen within a week and underwent a CGA by a frailty practitioner, consultant geriatrician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist. Referrals were made as appropriate to allied services eg dietician, pharmacy, continence teams etc.

Results

We refined the referral criteria and process, identifying the presence of a geriatrician at Lung MDT as key to ensuring incorporation of CFS (Rockwood) for effective MDT case discussion. Defining the cohort and pathway was challenging given the complex interplay of cancer symptom burden and comorbidity set against COVID, workforce pressures and cancer targets. Final referral criteria was age over 70, Rockwood 4 or more, a formal lung cancer diagnosis, and a plan to undergo active treatment. Referral numbers were low during the feasibility phase. Only 38 patients were referred and we saw 23 patients over a 2 year period. Referral rates increased in the final 3 months of the pilot although only 9 of 22 who met criteria were referred.

Conclusion

Establishment of an effective oncogeriatrics service is challenging. The feasibility study has established a baseline for potential activity and job planning. Analysis of individual patient benefit is ongoing. Longer term we aim to extend the service to support patients after treatment has started, provide prehab, and include patients with all types of cancer.

Introduction

AFU aims to provide Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment to frail, older service users.  A key component is Medication Review.

Patients living with frailty are more susceptible to medication side-effects and are often on Falls Risk Increasing Drugs (FRIDs¹) and medications with Anticholinergic Burden (ACB²) effects, which can cause falls/confusion/delirium/hallucinations. Aiming to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy, ACB and FRIDs scores, and optimise bone health is therefore essential.

Data highlighted only 17% of patients received Medication Review by a Pharmacist, which needed addressed without additional resources.

Method 

Medication Review usually involves a Pharmacist working alone and can be a lengthy process. We suggested a team approach with preparation and clinical details brought to a focused meeting with decisions made collectively.

After identifying key stakeholders, we introduced a focused Medication Review meeting twice weekly. 

Aims of review: reduce ACB and FRIDs scores, discontinue medications no longer indicated, improve bone health with a patient-centred approach throughout.

We produced a data collection form for audit purposes, and agreed how to communicate suggested changes to patients and other staff. 

Results

109 patients audited from October 2022-March 2023.

Medication Reviews increased from 17%-69%.

Improvements noted: average number of medications reduced from 9.5-9.0 (reduction diminished by addition of bone optimising medications³), number of patients with ACB ≥3 reduced from 32-11, average ACB score reduced from 1.9-0.9 and FRIDs score from 5.5-3.4.

ScHARR⁴ potential cost avoidance for 557 interventions was £37,501 - £86,218 with an average of 5 interventions/patient.

Conclusion 

A focused multidisciplinary Medication Review led to a reduced ACB and FRIDs score, with a potential saving from interventions. It also increased the number of patients receiving a Medication Review.

This innovative way of providing Medication Review makes best use of our time and skills, encourages education, and promotes conversations with patients/families about medications to see what matters to them.

References

1.  FRIDs (Falls Risk Increasing Drugs)

Northern Ireland Medicines Optimisation in Older People (MOOP)

2.  ACB Calculator

Available at: https://www.acbcalc.com/

3.  FRAX® Fracture Risk Assessment Tool

Available at: Frax.shef.ac.uk. (2023)

4.  ScHARR Potential Cost Avoidance

Karnon, J.; McIntosh, A.; Dean, J. et al. Modelling the expected net benefits of interventions to reduce the burden of medication errors. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2008, 13, 85–91.

Introduction

Our perioperative service for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) commenced preoperative assessment of co-morbid and frail patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in 2021. As part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and shared-decision-making process (SDM), we wanted to analyse the decisions our patients made around surgery and how many regretted having surgery.  

Methods

• Review of all orthopaedic patients seen by POPS between September 2021-December 2022

Intervention

• CGA and SDM on all patients
• Data collected: comorbidities, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), SDM outcome.
• Decision regret scale was sent out 6 months post op from August 2022.

Results

• 111 patients assessed. Median age 89 (range 60-97). Median CFS 4 (range 1-7)
• Median comorbidities 12 (range 2-22).
• Surgery considered: knee 43%, hip 33%, shoulder 10%, spine 6%, revision hip 5%, and revision knee 3%.
• 77% wanted to proceed with surgery and 13% did not after SDM. 5% were deemed not fit enough and 5% are still awaiting final decision outcomes.
• Decision regret data has been returned by 10/14 (71%) of patients who proceeded. None regretted their decision. 

Conclusion

The majority of patients seen by POPS wish to proceed with orthopaedic surgery. However, 13% did not wish to proceed following SDM which is similar to the 14% of patients who regretted undergoing surgery in other settings¹. Of those that have returned the 6-month post op questionnaires, none have regretted their decision. Understanding how optimisation and appropriate SDM impacts on the patient experience is important as frailty impacts adversely on patient reported outcomes in elective hip and knee surgery. Frail patients are also less likely to report their postoperative outcomes in national data sets compared to less frail patients².

1. CPOC website
2. Cook et al (2022). The impact of frailty on patient reported outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty. Age and Ageing.