Eyes

Introduction

Hearing loss affects 12 million people in the UK, it can have a severe negative impact on individuals, especially their communication, cognition and quality of life. Commonly reported effects of hearing loss are social isolation and mental health problems (e.g. anxiety and depression). There are a number of interventions for hearing loss, including hearing aids and cochlear implants. However, many individuals delay seeking treatment. This may be due to limited ­awareness of hearing loss and its consequences amongst the public. In addition, there is a large stigma surrounding hearing loss and having hearing aids.

This study will investigate the representations of hearing loss in the UK news media, particularly its impact on mental health, and identify ways to improve these representations.

Methods
Using Nexis (a database of news), we will examine newspaper articles featuring hearing loss during 2022. Multimodal critical discourse analysis will be used, which regards communicative choices (here, images and text) as both reflecting and shaping society, including by contributing to or challenging stigma. Patient and public involvement representatives will be consulted throughout regarding research objectives methods and the data interpretation.

Results

Results suggest that hearing loss is often described using celebrity accounts, often these individuals were younger adults. Many articles included inspirational stories of those with hearing loss, however the PPI group recommended that newspaper stories should provide a diverse representation of hearing loss. Inaccurate and outdated language was used to describe hearing devices. Mental health problems commonly discussed were depression, social isolation and dementia.

Discussion

The research will inform best practice recommendations for representing hearing loss in the public domain, which could be applied by healthcare organisations, research centres, charities and media outlets to help destigmatise hearing loss.

Introduction

Falls are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in frail patients, with visual impairment doubling the risk of falls. NICE advises a multifactorial approach to identify risk factors to be treated, improved and managed. This includes sensory/visual assessment, which is poorly done in practice. The aim is for 50% of relevant patients admitted with fractures following falls to have a vision assessment within 5 days of admission.

Methods

A modified RCP ‘Look out! Bedside vision check for falls prevention’ aid for healthcare professionals was utilised. Patients excluded were those with significant delirium/dementia or medically unwell. We regularly collected data on how many patients had a vision assessment performed whilst implementing interventions such as Teaching Sessions, Posters and including visual assessments in the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment(CGA).

Results

Initial results demonstrated poor rate of visual assessments in patients. With implementation of the modified tool, rates of visual assessments improved from 11%(n=1) to an average of 22%(n=4). Further interventions increased the overall average to 80%(n=36). The most effective intervention was including a visual assessment checkbox in the CGA. This improved rates of visual assessment in a subgroup of patients considered to have had falls due to visual impairment, from 33% to consistent rates of 100%. Additionally, the average days to assessment greatly reduced from 10.2 days to consistently under 5 days.

Conclusion

Identification of visual impairment reduces recurrent falls and hospital admissions. The project demonstrated the clinical significance of vision assessments - aiding the diagnosis of PSP, prescribing eye drops, and optician follow-up. Utilisation of the modified ‘Look Out’ tool is a simple way to assess vision on the ward. Posters and teaching sessions improved clinicians’ confidence. However implementing sensory impairment in the CGA proforma proved the most sustainable effort. Next steps include implementation in other Geriatric wards and Falls clinics.

Introduction

Falls are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in frail patients, with visual impairment doubling the risk of falls. NICE advises a multifactorial approach to identify risk factors to be treated, improved and managed. This includes sensory/visual assessment, which is poorly done in practice. The aim is for 50% of relevant patients admitted with fractures following falls to have a vision assessment within 5 days of admission.

Methods

A modified RCP ‘Look out! Bedside vision check for falls prevention’ aid for healthcare professionals was utilised. Patients excluded were those with significant delirium/dementia or medically unwell. We regularly collected data on how many patients had a vision assessment performed whilst implementing interventions such as Teaching Sessions, Posters and including visual assessments in the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment(CGA).

Results

Initial results demonstrated poor rate of visual assessments in patients. With implementation of the modified tool, rates of visual assessments improved from 11%(n=1) to an average of 22%(n=4). Further interventions increased the overall average to 80%(n=36). The most effective intervention was including a visual assessment checkbox in the CGA. This improved rates of visual assessment in a subgroup of patients considered to have had falls due to visual impairment, from 33% to consistent rates of 100%. Additionally, the average days to assessment greatly reduced from 10.2 days to consistently under 5 days.

Conclusion

Identification of visual impairment reduces recurrent falls and hospital admissions. The project demonstrated the clinical significance of vision assessments - aiding the diagnosis of PSP, prescribing eye drops, and optician follow-up. Utilisation of the modified ‘Look Out’ tool is a simple way to assess vision on the ward. Posters and teaching sessions improved clinicians’ confidence. However implementing sensory impairment in the CGA proforma proved the most sustainable effort. Next steps include implementation in other Geriatric wards and Falls clinics. 

Introduction: Poor oral health is linked to multiple health conditions, for example pneumonia, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, cancer and diabetes. Older people are particularly vulnerable to developing poor oral health due to comorbidities, medications used, and access to dental services, an effect magnified during hospital admissions. The aim of this project is to improve oral health and care received by inpatients on Healthcare for Older People (HfOP) wards.

Methods: A baseline audit of patient-response surveys on oral health access and behaviours, and care during hospital admissions was performed. HfOP inpatients aged >75 with capacity to consent were included. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles informed interventions, focusing on education of multidisciplinary staff. First round interventions included presenting/discussing initial audit findings at a regional HfOP meeting, and working with Oral Health Practitioners to do ward-based micro-teaching and develop/distribute posters raising awareness. Second round interventions included a more in-depth certified educational session available to all HfOP staff on oral health care and promotion, and posters on how to document oral health aspects on the electronic patient record.

Results: 82% (82/100) patients reported being registered with a dentist, 50% attending a dentist in the last 12 months. Initially, only 17% (17/100) reported ward staff taking measures to ensure/help support their oral health, rising to 46% (46/50) in the second audit.

Conclusions: Though patient surveys may under-represent oral health access/issues by excluding people unable to consent, and may under-represent staff support offered/provided by recall bias, our audit did highlight gaps in staff awareness/practice. Our interventions were designed to benefit all inpatients, via opportunistic ward-based education through the audit process and formal educational sessions. Limitations included logistics of ensuring access to all staff groups. Our goal is to formalise oral health training in core MDT teaching to generate systemic lasting improvement.

Other information: Registered with local trust audit programme.

Introduction:

In 2019, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) advised that all patients should have their vision screened if identified as a falls risk. Our aim was to implement a bedside visual screening test and establish an onward inpatient referral to Hospital Eye Services (HES).

Method:

This is a collaborative Quality Improvement project involving Geriatric Medicine, HES and the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB). A pilot study cross referenced falls admissions with previous known ophthalmic data to estimate the proportion of known vision loss in this group. In the second phase of the project, a bedside visual screening test has been introduced for all patients admitted to COTE with a fall. Patients failing the screening are reviewed by an RNIB Eye Clinic Liasion Officer (ECLO) and if necessary, a prompt inpatient HES review is arranged.

Results:

Of 182 patients admitted following a fall, in the pilot study, 112 (61%) were known to ophthalmology previously. Of patients known to ophthalmology, 28 (25%) had vision of 6/18 or worse and would be considered to struggle with daily living tasks. 12 (10%) had a certificate of visual impairment (CVI) and 3 (3%) were eligible for CVI but had not been previously registered. One year following implementation of bedside vision testing, 287 patients had been reviewed after failing bedside screening. 97 of these had an onward referral sent or an intervention performed. The first ‘COTE ECLO’ post has been funded as a result of this work.

Conclusion:

Assessing vision is a critical element of the assessment of patients with falls. Through collaboration with the RNIB and Ophthalmology a successful pathway has been developed to address visual impairment in this vulnerable group of patients.

Background

This healthcare evaluation focussed on the effectiveness of an orthoptic-led inpatient vision screening service at Nottingham University Hospitals for older adults admitted with a fragility hip fracture. The service was developed in response to national guidance, which recommended a multifactorial assessment, including a vision assessment for older adults presenting following a fall.

Method

Vision screening was carried out by orthoptists on eligible patients ≥65 years of age admitted to the Trauma and Orthopaedic wards with a hip fracture. Retrospective data for patients screened between 2015-2019 were analysed, including: patient demographics, screening eligibility and outcome, ophthalmology referrals made, ophthalmology appointment attendance and outcome.

Results

Of 3321 patients admitted with hip fracture between 2015-2019, 2033 (61%) were eligible for vision screening and 1532 (75%) of these were screened. 784 (51%) patients screened had an ocular abnormality requiring ophthalmology referral via their GP, or a sight test at an optician. Only 144/383 (38%) requiring ophthalmology referral were successfully referred and only 107/186 (58%) patients given appointments attended. 98/107 had pathology and cataracts was the most common finding (51%). 61/98 (62%) patients had treatable vision impairment. 

Conclusions

We found a large proportion of hip fracture patients who had impaired vision; much of which was easily treatable and could be detected effectively with orthoptic-led bedside screening. The most common eye problem in those referred to ophthalmology was cataracts. An internal referral pathway to ophthalmology is proposed. There is a need to investigate reasons for disengagement with eye care services in this population.

Introduction Oral frailty (OF), gradual loss of oral function combined associated with presbyphagia often in conjunction with cognitive and physical decline, has been recommended to be considered as a geriatric giant. DENTAL has been suggested as a possible screening tool for OF. We have looked at the prevalence of OF and its association with dysphagia, frailty and formal care, amongst people admitted acutely to the acute medical/frailty wards in our hospital. Methods OF, dysphagia and frailty were screened for as part of the routine clinical assessment of patients during the usual clinical ward round. Screening tools used were DENTAL for OF, Rockwood Score for frailty and 4QT for dysphagia. Age, sex comorbidities and the need for formal care was documented. Results 101 people were assessed over a 4 week period. Mean age was 84 years (65-99), 58 (57.4%) were female, 31(30.7%) were independent, 33 (32.6%) dementia, 57 (56.4%) frail, 54 (53.4%) had swallowing problems, and 34 (33.6%) OF. Of those with OF 97% had dysphagia, 88% were frail and 85% required formal care support (85%). OF was associated with dysphagia (p<.0001), frailty (p< 0.0001), formal care support (p<0.05) and dementia (p<0.05). there was an association between needing (p<0.01). conclusions of is associated with dysphagia, the need for care. may result in poor oral health contribute to dysphagia frailty, conversely due dependency nutrition dehydration. associations most likely be bidirectional. further work required elucidate this. clinical staff aware include screening their assessment older adult.

Introduction

Care home residents can have variable access to eye care services & treatments. We developed a collaborative approach between optometrists, care homes, and primary & secondary care to enable personalised patient-centred care. Objective To develop and evaluate an integrated model of eye care for care home residents.

Methods

Small scale plan-do-study-act (PDSA) service tests were completed in three care-homes in Southwark (2 residential, 1 nursing) between November 2021 to May 2022. Processes were compared to historical feedback & hospital-based ophthalmology clinic attendances (Mar 2019-2020). Hospital-like assessments were piloted at two care homes for feasibility & acceptability. Further piloting utilised usual domiciliary optometry-led assessment with multidisciplinary meeting access (including optometrist, GP, geriatrician, ophthalmologist and care home nurse) to reduce duplication of assessments and to evaluate MDM processes and referral rates.

Results

Examination was 100% successful at home (visual acuity & pressure measurement) compared to hospital outpatients (71.7% success visual acuity, 54.5% pressures). Examination was faster than in hospital settings (16 minutes vs 45 minutes-1 hour). Residents were away from usual activities for 32 minutes vs 6 hours for hospital visits including transport. Residents were less distressed with home-based assessments. Did-Not-Attend (DNA) rates reduced (26.7% to 0%), secondary care discharge rates improved (8.4% to 32%). Hospital eye service referral were indicated in 19% -23%, half of which were for consideration of cataract surgery. Alternative conservative plans were agreed at MDM for nursing home residents who were clinically too frail or would not have been able to comply with treatments avoiding 33% unnecessary referrals.

Conclusions

Home-based eye care assessments appear better tolerated & are more efficient for residents, health & care staff. Utilising an MDM for optometrists to discuss residents with ophthalmologists and wider MDT members enabled personalised patient-centred decision-making. Future work to test this borough wide is in progress.