MDT

Introduction:

Postural Hypotension is a very common presentation in the elderly population. Appropriate knowledge to record postural hypotension & non-medicinal management for this is very important among MDT members working in the care of the elderly wards.

Method:

We set out a questionnaire to assess the knowledge among MDT ( multidisciplinary) members. An educational programme was initiated to improve the knowledge among MDT members. A complete audit cycle was done and the knowledge was reassessed with the same questionnaire based on the principles of the PDSA (Plan, Do, Study & Act) cycle.

Results:

It showed that the correct way of checking for postural blood pressure improved from 52.4% to 92% in recording the blood pressure. Correct identification of postural blood pressure improved from 33.3% to 88%. Self-rating of confidence to identify correctly postural blood pressure improved from 47.6% to 64% among the MDT Members. It was difficult to compare the answers about non-medicinal methods and exercises to help postural hypotension as there was heterogeneity in answers. It was also not possible to compare the impact of individual interventions on the alleviation of postural blood pressure.

Conclusion:

Good improvement in the recording and non-medicinal management of Postural hypotension was observed in both the wards among the MDT Members. It is very important to have good knowledge and understanding in the management of this common condition as it helps in the identification and better management.

Introduction

It is well recognised that patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) have significant symptom burden in advanced stages of their disease. Integration of movement disorder and palliative care services has been limited by concerns about resource and sustainability. We present our experience of establishing a movement disorders palliative care multidisciplinary meeting. Method In 2019 we established a multidisciplinary virtual bimonthly meeting between movement disorders and palliative care specialists. Referrals were accepted from movement disorder specialists, community Parkinson’s practitioners and palliative care specialists. Referring clinicians all actively applied primary palliative care approaches within their existing services.

Aims of the meeting were to facilitate holistic management of complex needs, support advance care planning (ACP) and consider referral to specialist palliative care services. Result 37 patients in total were discussed over a 2-year period (although the service was limited for a time due to COVID pressures). On average 3 new patients were discussed per meeting. Reasons for referral included motor and non-motor symptoms, support with ACP, medication advice, caregiver concerns and emotional distress.

Meeting outcomes included medication adjustments, expediting reviews, hospice support, carer support, and referral to other services. Since the meetings started 23 (62%) patients have died. Of these, 30% died in hospital compared with the national average of 43.4%. The average between discussion at the meeting and death was 139 days. The meeting has generated education opportunities, triggered joint assessments and a professionals’ framework for the palliative management of patients with a movement disorder.

Conclusions

We present the experience of an MDT embedded within an early integrated palliative care service for movement disorders. The MDT has strengthened partnership working and findings suggest that alongside active primary palliative care, specialist palliative care for PD can be sustainable and resource efficient in a UK setting.

Introduction: Syncope is a common clinical problem with a lifetime prevalence of 20%.¹ Syncope shares clinical features with other disorders including seizures, metabolic disturbances and sleep disorders.² The assessment and management of syncope can be challenging.

The syncope service at the QEUH is run by geriatricians and cardiologists with an interest in syncope. Although MDTs are recognised key components in contemporary patient care in areas such as heart failure and cancer management, there is no guidance on MDT working in syncope management.^3/4 In November 2017, a syncope MDT was introduced at the QEUH involving cardiologists, geriatricians, a neurologist and cardiac physiologists. This in-person MDT occurs monthly with outcomes recorded on electronic medical records in addition to a database. The aim of this review was to understand the potential impact of the MDT on diagnostic yield and time to further investigation or management.

Method: A retrospective case note analysis was performed for patients reviewed at the Syncope MDT between November 2017 and December 2021.

Results: 103 patients were discussed with an average age of 64 years. The main reason for referral was cardiology specialist advice (65%), neurology specialist advice (19.4%) and complex case review (13.6%). After MDT discussion, the percentage of patients with unexplained TLoC reduced from 26.2% to 14.6% without requirement for additional investigations. 8.7% of patients were started on anti-epileptic medication prior to outpatient neurology review after a diagnosis of seizure disorder was established and 23.1% of patients were streamlined for pacemaker or ILR insertion.

Conclusion: Introduction of a syncope MDT reduces unexplained syncope rates in complex patients, streamlines investigations, reduces the need for multi-speciality outpatient reviews and allows earlier introduction of anti-epileptic medication for those with a new seizure disorder. These benefits improve the patient experience by reducing time to diagnosis and treatment.