CGA

Introduction:

Nationally, there have been increased attendances to hospital for older frailer adults. Recommendations from GIRFT and NHS England acknowledge the importance of identifying frailty, and the role that dedicated specialist services play. Best practice indicates when frailer adults receive a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), this reduces patient harm and improves outcomes.

Locally in October 2022, Bolton NHS Trust converted an Acute Medical Assessment Unit (AMU) to a 22 bedded frailty unit, the Older Person’s Assessment Unit (OPAU) to provide older frailer adults with early specialist input and review from a dedicated multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The unit is run by three Consultant Geriatricians and a dedicated wider MDT, with links to community partners and when needed preferential admission to Geriatric base wards.

Methods:

Data was collated and analysed with set metrics by the Trust’s Business Intelligence Department. Data was compared for the 3 months pre and post inception of the frailty unit. Regular service reviews occur and utilise PDSA cycles to assess interventional change.

Results:

The average age of patients pre-intervention was 69, and post intervention was 79.6.

Pre-intervention, the average length of stay for patients admitted from AMU to Geriatric base wards was 25.93 days. This reduced to 18.79 days post-intervention.

The average length of stay for patients admitted to non-Geriatric base wards was 10.77 days, this reduced to 8.62 days post intervention.

Conclusion:

Specialist Consultant Geriatrician and MDT input on a dedicated frailty unit has reduced the average length of stay of patients to all base medical wards assessed, especially base Geriatric wards. This has clear implications on patient flow, and benefits patients and the Trust. We expect this will have a compound and positive effect on patients by reducing the risk of deconditioning and potential development of inpatient harms.

Introduction

The British Geriatrics Society and NHS England recommend that patients aged 65 and over should be screened for frailty when presenting to healthcare services to facilitate early comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Recognition of frailty frequently relies on assessment by FY1s. We sought to assess a) how confident FY1s are in recognising and managing frailty, b) their understanding of CGA, and c) how these change during the year.

Methods

Questionnaires (quantitative and qualitative data) were given to FY1s at induction, 6 months, and 12 months. Teaching sessions on frailty and CGA were delivered. We collated feedback on how frailty recognition and CGA knowledge had altered their assessment of older people.

Results

All FY1 Doctors completed the survey at induction. The 6 months and 12 months surveys were emailed to FY1s. The survey response rate was 100% (31/31), 68% (21/31) and 58% (18/31), respectively. At induction, 23% (7/31) reported they were “quite” or “very” confident in assessing for frailty. This increased to 71% at 6 months and 100% at 12 months. Fifty-two per cent (16/31) of FY1 Doctors were aware of a tool to assess for frailty at baseline, increasing to 100% (18/18) at 12 months. Knowledge of CGA improved less, from 48% (15/31) at baseline to 83% (15/18) at 12 months. There was no association between speciality experience and confidence levels. Feedback from FY1 doctors indicated that frailty recognition allowed identification of patients who may benefit from advanced care planning discussions and triggered early therapy input.

Conclusions

Despite BGS and NHS England recommendations, at induction, FY1s lack confidence in frailty recognition and assessment. Through experiential learning and targeted teaching this improved, not limited to those in geriatric medicine. We recommend final year medical students need increased frailty and CGA specific education to improve their confidence when assessing frail older patients.

Background:

Populations in sub-Saharan Africa are ageing rapidly and Tanzania is one country experiencing this acute demographic shift. Multimorbidity (the presence of two or more chronic conditions (1)) is common in the community and associated with greater risk of hospitalisation. To-date, the prevalence amongst older hospital inpatients is unknown.

Objective:

To establish the prevalence of multimorbidity amongst older hospitalised adults in northern Tanzania.

Methods:

For 6-months, adults aged ≥60 admitted to medical wards in four hospitals were invited to participate. A standardised questionnaire, structured around the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, was completed. This included items regarding health insurance and exemption from health user fees (granted based on age and low socioeconomic means). Multimorbidity was self-reported using a list of 16 conditions from the Study of Global Ageing and Adult Health Questionnaire, with additional screening for hypertension.

Results:

Between March and August 2021, 540 adults aged ≥60 years were admitted and 308 (57%) underwent assessment. Reasons for non-participation included discharge (n=159) and death (n=34) prior to researcher attendance. Of 277 participants, 145 (52%) had self-reported multimorbidity. Data were unavailable for 31 participants who were unsure of their past medical history. Hypertension was reported by 146 (52%) and an additional 35 (11%) had mean readings ≥140/90 when screened. Mann-Whitney U revealed a significantly greater burden of multimorbidity in those with health insurance (p<0.001) or exemption from user fees (p=.34), compared with participants without.

Conclusion:

Multimorbidity is common amongst hospitalised older adults in Tanzania. Higher rates amongst those with insurance or exemption are likely because of greater access to healthcare services and therefore diagnosis. Simple screening for hypertension identified further individuals with multimorbidity, demonstrating that it may remain underestimated. Widening access to healthcare is a government priority, but the impact of multimorbidity also poses a challenge to hospitals and policymakers.

References:

1. Johnston, MC et al. 2018. European Journal of Public Health, 29, 182-189.

Background Polypharmacy is a recognised burden on patients with frailty. Medication reviews as part of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) ensure appropriate prescribing and minimise harms. This project aimed to develop and initiate a pharmacist delivered frailty medication review tool to enhance existing CGA within our acute frailty service. Methods A structured in-patient medication review tool was developed based on the STOPIT and STOPPFRAIL tools for patients with a clinical frailty score (CFS) of >4. Initial work tested this on 20 patients in our frailty ward evaluating usability and efficacy. A sample of patients seen by the acute frailty team were audited against this tool. Data was collected on falls risk medications, Anticholinergic Burden (ACB), medications stopped, medications to review and cost savings. On identifying the potential benefits, this tool was trialled by pharmacists on all elderly care wards with similar outcomes collected. Results. Twelve acute frailty inpatients’ CGAs were audited against the tool. Five had some evidence of a polypharmacy review but no FRAX or ACB scores were completed. 58% of patients were on 3 or more 'falls medications. Overall, 19 medications should have been stopped, 5 medications could have been reduced and 14 medications highlighted for review in primary care, with a potential cost saving of £956.35/year. After initiating pharmacist reviews with the tool, 34 of 34 patients had a review, 80% of FRAX scores were documented, ACB score was completed for all patients. All patients were taking medications that increased risk of falls (average 3.5/patient) with 16 patients on ≥4. Eighty-five medications were stopped, 10 medications reduced and 33 medications highlighted for review in primary care, with a cost saving of £2755.29/year. Conclusions This project developed a pharmacist delivered acute frailty polypharmacy tool which enhanced existing frailty medication reviews with potential cost savings.